Search for TV Listings, Movies, Celebrities, Photos & More

In This Section

« WGA Post-Strike Watch: News About Returning Shows

Oscars to Go On, As Execs Downplay Strike Impact

080122academyawards.jpg
Oscar statuette by Bob D'Amico/ABC
The Oscars show will go on, but not without the benefit of Hollywood-style rationalization as to why the Academy would hold the event in the face of a writers strike. After all, if the strike continues into the kudoscast's Feb. 24 date, both writers and actors who would potentially be attending as guests or nominees would likely not attend.

In response to the potential conflict of interest, several event officials emphasize that of the 26 award categories, only four are for acting (and thus would benefit from the presence of the announced winner). Add in some musical extravaganzas, clips of Hollywood through history, and voila — you've got an awards show. Still, Academy Awards director Louis J. Horvitz tells TV Guide, "We need [the writers]. And it's doing us no good with them being on the picket lines when we're hoping that they're going to be with us on the 24th."

To make sure no one doubts his commitment to the WGA, Horvitz says, "Nobody is denying for any moment that the writers don't deserve respect. I totally respect them." That said, he notes that the Academy Awards aren't really that much about writers, and as such would eschew a Golden Globes-esque watering down: "[A]s I said, there are 22 awards that have nothing to do with writers, and [categories that] have nothing to do with actors."

Academy Awards producer Gil Cates also confirms the show's status and reiterates Horvitz's points. Even if the strike is still going on, he said, "Some people may cross the picket line, and some may not, but the show's the show. There's entertainment, there are going to be production numbers, so I feel very confident that it will be a good show."

And what are the chances of the show not having to scale back the categories that do honor writers and actors? AMPAS prez Sid Ganis says his organization is "in the process of talking to the WGA" regarding a possible waiver. In the meantime, though, "We're going on as planned. We have a lot of work to do, a lot of people to honor — some of them are actors, and many of them are not." — Anna Dimond, with reporting by Carita Rizzo

Related:
Female Writers May Lose Chance to Shine at Oscars
Oscars Boss Preps a Plan B, If Show Is Picketed


Posted by TV Guide News
Jan 22, 2008 3:06 PM
Good for them. Do what you have to do and let the chips fall as they may.
Posted by Justeace
Jan 22, 2008 4:19 PM
For the sake of all the talented non-actors nominated (clearly the vast majority of nominees) I am glad it's going on, but let's get real here.

No writers means no jokes and if there's one thing the bloated Oscars ceremony needs it's a good sense of humor. Additionally, no actors means not only an impact on those 4 acting categories, but no celebrity presenters, which is half (if not 75%) of the fun. Especially in a year that lacks many big budget successful movie nominations. People want to see stars.

They better figure this out with a quickness, that's all I'm going to say. Otherwise, a show may go on, but no one's going to give a care.
Posted by NoirCat
Jan 22, 2008 4:29 PM
Sorry but I will be avoiding this awards show. If the writers are not involved, than neither will I. This show is too damn stuffy anyway, without the writers and the comedic bits, it will be a disaster!
Posted by Ranger99
Jan 22, 2008 4:45 PM
Search Community
Advertisement