Search for TV Listings, Movies, Celebrities, Photos & More
Home > News & Views Home > TV Guide Editors' Blogs
TV Guide Editors' Blogs

In This Section

TV Guide Spotlight

Also on TVGuide.com

« The Biz

What Makes Presidential Debates So Great?

080404kerry-bush.jpg
John Kerry and George Bush courtesy NBC
Who ever thought the presidential primary debates would be one of the biggest TV attractions of the year? Cable news channels have reaped record ratings and even the broadcast networks have been vying for the events because of viewer interest. It should only grow more intense when the two nominees meet in the fall. The debates are already scheduled for Sept. 26, Oct. 7 and Oct. 15. But getting the candidates to participate has never been easy according to a new book Inside the Presidential Debates (shop Amazon.com) by Craig L. Lamay and Newton N. Minow, a former FCC commissioner and vice chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, which has organized the face-offs in every election year since 1976. The Biz talked to the authors about what makes the debates so great.

TVGuide.com: One surprising fact in the book is how for 16 years there were no presidential debates because it was logistically impossible. The federal government's equal-time law required every declared candidate to be included. Now only those who reach 15 percent in the national polls make the cut.
Craig L. Lamay:
The whole point was to ensure that minor-party or third-party candidates would not be excluded from press coverage, particularly in lots of communities where a television station might favor a particular candidate. The idea was to make sure all candidates' views get equal opportunity to be heard. The intention was good, but like many well-intentioned things, it had a downside.

TVGuide.com: But it was President Ford who really prompted the change in the law because he was so far down in the polls. He wanted to debate Jimmy Carter.
Newton N. Minow:
Years later, Ford said, "I think the debates helped me. You've got to remember, I was 32 points behind and I almost won the election."

TVGuide.com: Your book points out how both Presidents Johnson and Nixon didn't want to debate their challengers, so the equal-time law wasn't changed. Now it seems that it would be impossible for a presidential candidate to avoid it.
Minow:
Young people who have grown up with presidential debates expect them. I don't think any candidate can escape it.
Lamay: Absolutely. Remember in 1992 when President George H.W. Bush [who balked at debating Bill Clinton and Ross Perot] was followed around on the campaign trail by the guy in the chicken suit? If you avoided a debate today, you'd have millions of virtual chickens [all over the Internet].

TVGuide.com: I love the stories about the conditions the campaigns try to enforce for the debates.
Lamay:
A lot of that kind of stuff is posing — like two roosters in a yard. It doesn't affect the substance of the debates at all. The negotiations for the first debate between Bush and Clinton were about the placement of water glasses. At one point, they wanted to put them on the floor. Then the campaigns realized that to pick them up the candidates would have to bend over and kind of moon a national television audience. Suddenly they both realized they should put them on the table.

TVGuide.com: Has it gotten harder to get the broadcast networks to schedule time for the debates because they've ceded so much news coverage to cable and are reluctant to preempt entertainment programming?
Minow:
Not so far, but I think in time it's going to get tougher. As of now they're all going to carry it.

TVGuide.com: The first 2004 debate between President Bush and Sen. John Kerry set a record with 62.5 million viewers. Will a meeting between Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. Hillary Clinton top that?
Minow:
I think it will, absolutely. It will be higher and the debates will be repeated and distributed in all kinds of new ways on the Internet. Every American will have a chance to see them.

TVGuide.com: Will we ever have a presidential debate that's only shown online?
Minow:
At some point that will happen.
Lamay: We did have some [like that] among the primary debates. I don't see why it wouldn't be in 2008, even if it were not done by the debate commission.

TVGuide.com: You've been around for all of the debates, Mr. Minow. What's your favorite moment?
Minow:
I was at the debate in Cleveland in 1980 when Ronald Reagan said to Jimmy Carter, "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" At that moment I knew the election was over.


Posted by Stephen Battaglio
Apr 6, 2008 4:43 PM
We fool ourselves into thinking we have a choice when we limit
ourselves to only 2 parties.

There are at least 2 ways to look at any subject, multiply that by all
of the different issues, both real and those meant to distract us from
the real, and it becomes apparent that there is room for more points of
view.

The 2 major parties tend to target their appeal to the extremists in
their party instead of towards everyone.

There was a debate in Cincinnati yesterday for 3rd party candidates.

They have more varied views than the politicians using polls to form
policy.

Some candidates have better ideas than what we have heard from the
duopoly of the Democrats and Republicans.

And others have some nutty ideas such as about UFOs.

That would make the debate both informative and entertaining but not
even CSPAN is covering it.

Many ideas by the 2 major parties were voiced by 3rd party candidates
years earlier, but were ahead of their time.

It doesn't matter if they won't get elected, let their ideas be heard.
A few quotes:

  • The 2 party system is 1 better than the 1 party system. -
    Eugene McCartney

  • If you vote for the lesser of 2 evils you are still getting
    evil. - Ralph Nader

  • Doing the same thing
    over and over again is the definition of insanity. If you
    keep voting for Democrats and Republicans and expect things are going
    to change, you're crazy - Michael Badnarek

Posted by DotKhan
Apr 7, 2008 12:36 PM
I find the debates very interesting and agree with the poster before me who stated that some of the other parties should be represented at the table. I, also, feel that so many Democratic candidates feel that FOX News network won't be "fair and balanced" and they allow the DNC to dictate to them that they can't debate on that network. In truth, that network, is seen in most parts of the country and those candidates could reach out to more people. I won't vote for someone who is afraid to go on FOX, for fear of alieanating the DNC. To date only Hillary has had the fortitude to show up on FOX on Greta Van Sustern and has been interviewed by many other reporters. (Where is BARACK -- a little frightened that he won't be adored as he was on the View??) I, also, feel that before a person votes, it would be nice if they watched some of these debates -- you learn a great deal about the candidate (or whomever pulls the candidates strings) and their positions on different subject. JMHO!
Posted by jabber64
Apr 7, 2008 2:10 PM
Advertisement