Search for TV Listings, Movies, Celebrities, Photos & More
Home > News & Views Home > TV Guide Editors' Blogs
TV Guide Editors' Blogs

In This Section

TV Guide Spotlight

Also on TVGuide.com

« The Biz

2007 versus 1988: Television Will Be Struck Harder This Time

071119biz-leno.jpg
Jay Leno by Paul Drinkwater/NBC
The strike by the Writers Guild of America is just two weeks old and there's already been a lot of fretting about what fans will do when first-run episodes of their favorite shows run out. So what will happen if, despite the recent agreement to resume talks on Nov. 26, it goes on for 22 weeks like the last work stoppage in 1988?

According to Shari Ann Brill, a senior vice president at the ad-buying firm Carat, this strike is going to hurt a whole lot more. "Television as a medium will survive this, but the days of powerful rule by the broadcasters over audiences and advertisers could suffer a crippling blow from a prolonged disruption," she says.

The 1988 strike, she noted, occurred in early March. This was before the official TV season included the May sweeps, so most series had completed production for the season. Even though there was no end in sight for the work stoppage, the networks went ahead and presented a new fall schedule for the 1988-89 season and sold time on it to advertisers.

The strike was settled in August, which delayed the start of the season for many series. But there was still plenty of stuff to watch. NBC had the Summer Olympics in Seoul, which started in mid-September. Major League Baseball playoffs were still delivering muscular ratings and were not the event that networks dread carrying now. It was a presidential campaign season in which the networks carried several debates and didn't have to share them with several cable news outlets. Theatrical movies and miniseries were still a major staple of the prime-time lineups, and they had plenty of those in the pipeline.

The strike of '07 was called smack in the middle of the production cycle for most shows. With the networks out of the movie business, and sports less of a player on the broadcast networks this time of year, the networks are relying on repeats, reality and newsmagazines. Ad agencies will be monitoring the situation closely, Brill says, because a significant ratings drop means they'll have to make alternative plans to sell products. "There are very few alternatives to replace the reach and impact of first-run broadcast television," she says.

Needless to say, the competitive landscape was a lot different in 1988. There were only 17 national cable networks that were rated by Nielsen. Brill says to compare that with the 88 cable outlets Nielsen measures now. "The broadcast television business is in a much more fragile state than it was in 1988," she says. "Erosion and fragmentation continues, and the presence of online and offline TV alternatives continues to grow." If the strike goes far into 2008, she adds, "the networks will experience an accelerated [ratings] decline."

The drop was already evident in the first casualty of the strike, the late-night shows. Repeat episodes of The Tonight Show with Jay Leno were down 16 percent in viewers 18 to 49 during the first strike week. Late Night with Conan O'Brien was off nine percent. (CBS's Late Show with David Letterman and ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live fared better with only slight decreases). But if the trend continues, the hosts will feel the pressure to return before the strike is over, something that's already being discussed.

For ongoing WGA strike coverage, read TVGuide.com's Strike Watch blog.


Posted by Stephen Battaglio
Nov 19, 2007 9:54 AM
The difference between the two year's, is that back in 88', television was actually good. I didn't mind watching repeats and guess what? Shows ran for a FULL SEASON! So there was none of this starting in October, then ending with some mini-cliffhanger right before Thanksgiving, then coming back in February only to end in early April! There were also no reality shows, and writers back then knew how to write comedies that were actually funny.
Posted by PriscillaPal
Nov 19, 2007 10:19 AM
The front page definitely says "1998" instead of "1988."
Posted by AikenIdin
Nov 20, 2007 10:06 AM
but the days of powerful rule by the broadcasters over audiences and advertisers could suffer a crippling blow from a prolonged disruption

I'm relieved that people, especially in the advertising community, realize what a powerful force the fans can be in this process. For anyone wanting to show there support or even help out the striking writers you can see what you can do at http://www.fans4writers.com/
Posted by asta77
Nov 20, 2007 10:38 AM
Priscilla:

In actuality, seasons for most hourlong shows were roughly the same length (perhaps 24-26 vs. 22-24 eps) in terms of new content per season. The difference was the tradition of showing repeats between batches of new episodes, which has disappeared with the expansion of cable network prominence. Previously, the networks could deal with a slight dip during repeats, because viewers had little else to watch and would grudgingly rewatch their favorites. Now, audiences are a lot more savvy and prefer fresh content to repeats.

But, as usual, perception trumps fact.
Posted by entil2001
Nov 20, 2007 12:13 PM
Advertisement