Search for TV Listings, Movies, Celebrities, Photos & More
Home > News & Views Home > TV Guide Editors' Blogs
TV Guide Editors' Blogs

In This Section

TV Guide Spotlight

Also on TVGuide.com

« Ask FlickChick

Oscar Surprises, Part 2: Blanchett, Mortensen, Hal Holbrook and More!

080122viggomortensen.jpg
Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises courtesy Focus Features
A surprising number of movies had to make do with single nominations in the major categories:

Viggo Mortensen picked up a best-actor nom as an icy Russian Gangster in David Cronenberg's brutal thriller Eastern Promises, ditto Johnny Depp for Tim Burton's gothic adaptation of Stephen Sondheim's musical Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street.

Sentimental favorite Hal Holbrook, 82 (he'll be 83 by the time the ceremony takes place), took a best supporting actor nomination for Sean Penn's Into the Wild, based on Jon Krakauer's nonfiction account of a troubled young man's search for meaning that eventually takes him deep into the unforgiving Alaskan wilderness. It was also ignored in all other major categories despite strong reviews for Penn's direction and adapted screenplay, as well as Emile Hirsch's performance in the lead role. Audiences failed to warm to the film.

Much-loved veteran character actress Ruby Dee, 83, got the only nomination — for best-supporting actress — accorded Ridley Scott's American Gangster, stealing the spotlight from leads Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe as, respectively, a courtly drug dealer and the cop who brings down his heroin empire.

Philip Seymour Hoffman was recognized for his supporting performance as a scruffy CIA agent in the otherwise ignored Charlie Wilson's War — not for his excoriating turn in 83-year-old, much-lauded director Sidney Lumet's Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, which was ignored entirely.

Supporting-actor nominee Casey Affleck represents for the Brad Pitt starrer The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford — I'm sure you don't need to be told who played Jesse and who played Ford. Affleck's leading turn in the thriller Gone, Baby, Gone (from the novel by multiple Oscar-winner Dennis Lehane of Mystic River fame) was ignored.

But for me, the real shocker is double-nominee Cate Blachett's best-actress nod for Elizabeth: The Golden Age, an overblown historical drama whose sumptuous sets and costumes are by far the best things about it. That said, her supporting nomination for playing one of the many Bob Dylans featured in Todd Haynes' kaleidoscopic I'm Not There is richly deserved. Blanchett is this year's only double acting nominee; neither film was recognized in any other major category.

Oscar Nomination Surprises, Part 1: Juno and Tommy Lee Jones
Oscar Surprises, Part 3: The Films That Made Out Big. Plus: Foreign Invasion!


Posted by Maitland McDonagh
Jan 22, 2008 9:36 AM
The Ruby Dee nomination was obviously a career one, happens every year.
Cate Blachett for Elizabeth is the biggest joke of a nomination. That took away a well deserved nomination for someone else.
I was very disappointed to not see more love for Into The Wild. If Ellen Page can get an acting nomination for cracking wise for an hour and a half(and she did do it well) then I think Emile Hirsch deserved one for the hell he put himself through for Into the Wild.
Posted by sbunc92
Jan 22, 2008 10:06 AM
I am heartbroken at the snub for Into the Wild- is it that Hollywood (still) doesn't like Sean Penn? It's the only explanation I can come up with for the very superior film being completely left out of the Adapted Screenplay (an absolute crime), Best Director (they're insane), Best Picture (what were they thinking), and Best Actor (Emile Hirsch deserves it just as much if not more than Ellen Page deserves a Best Actress nomination).
Posted by bookgirl42
Jan 22, 2008 3:08 PM
Andy Griffith should have been nominated for Waitress.
Posted by SNLfan
Jan 23, 2008 3:18 AM
SNLFan:

I agree -- Andy Griffith was great in Waitress.
Posted by Maitland McDonagh
Jan 23, 2008 11:52 AM
Maitland, who else has been a double-nominee, for what, and when? Thank you very much.
Posted by Jay
Jan 23, 2008 12:32 PM
Looks like Jamie Foxx was the most recent double nominees with a 2005 Best Actor win for Ray and a nomination for Supporting actor for Collateral.

But Clint Eastwood looks like the king of multiple nominees. He got a 1993 win for Directing and for best Picture for Unforgiven and a nomination for Best actor for that flick making him a triple nominee. In 2004 another Best Bicture and Director nomination-both for Mystic River. In 2005 Million Dollar Baby snagged him wins for Directing and Best Picture and a nomination for Best Actor. And 2007 brought him nominations for Best Picture and for directing for Letters from Iwo Jima.
Posted by DaMess
Jan 25, 2008 4:16 AM
It's after 4 PM on a Friday, and no FlickChick Q&A yet - why? I gotta have my late week (usually Thursday) Ask FlickChick fix. For those of you who haven't done so, send your questions in now; if you've done so before, and have another question, send it in. If there are enough questions for Maitland to answer, the column can run forever, otherwise, I fear for its eventual demise.
Posted by Jay
Jan 25, 2008 4:13 PM
Advertisement