In This Section
TV Guide Spotlight
Also on TVGuide.com
|
« Ask FlickChick
DVD Tuesday: Apocalypto -- through the past, darkly
Apocalypto courtesy Buena Vista Home Entertainment/Touchstone
Mel Gibson's Apocalypto: Bloodthirsty, exploitative spectacle or haunting look at a vanished world through 21st-century eyes?
Send your movie questions to FlickChick.
See Maitland McDonagh and Ken Fox review this week's new flicks on the Movie Talk vodcast!
Hear Maitland on the weekly podcast TVGuide Talk!
I dragged my heels to Mel Gibson's Apocalypto when it screened for critics last year: No matter how hard I tried to keep an open mind, I just wasn't interested. And I came out a convert, which is why it's this week's DVD Tuesday pick.
Now, I've read enough to know that the film mixes characteristics of different periods in Mayan civilization. I don't really care: I don't claim to be well-versed in the details of Mesoamerican culture, but I know better than to think seeing Apocalypto is a substitute for reading historical accounts. I'm also well aware that it is, first and foremost, a spectacle of the past refracted and filtered through the preoccupations of the present. What historical film isn't?
As a movie I found it enthralling – though, I must caution, it took me a while to warm to it. Set what's now the Yucatan peninsula, Apocalypto begins by introducing a group of Mayan villagers who hunt and farm in the jungle, many days from the nearest city over treacherous terrain. A small hunting party kills a tapir and heads for home, horsing around and teasing one strapping fellow whose inability to get his lovely wife pregnant is the talk of the town. The mix of glossy ethnographic spectacle and Porky's-style raunch (apparently modern-day frat boys have no monopoly on juvenile pranks and vulgar male bonding) is nervy, but it worked for me: Rather than validating the stereotypes of noble savages or mystical ciphers, Gibson's depiction of the hunt and its aftermath makes the Mayan villagers seem as familiar as a bunch of construction workers or stockbrokers knocking off work and blowing off steam.
And that makes it all the more shocking when brutal chaos descends in the form of warriors from the city, who pillage, murder, rape and take prisoners. Jaguar Paw, son of the village chief, manages to secret his wife and child in a deep pit before he's captured; he and his neighbors are then force marched through the jungle by the commanding Zero Wolf and his men. When they arrive at their destination, some are sold, others prepared for sacrifice and one -- Jaguar Paw – makes a daring run for it.
The film's second half is sheer man-against-himself action-adventure, as Jaguar Paw summons all his mental and physical strength to overcome of series of grueling tests of endurance, from exhaustion and injury to the outraged warriors dogging his heels. In many ways it's not so different from the new Werner Herzog-Christian Bale film Rescue Dawn, and it's genuinely thrilling. In fact, Jaguar Paw's ordeal strongly echoes those of solitary survivors in The Naked Prey (1966), Run of the Arrow (1957), The Tracker (2004) and even Italian exploitation shockers like Make Them Die Slowly (1981).
But the film is also filled with stunning images, none more so than the huge, angular Mayan city, surrounded by a blighted landscape of dying trees and the choking, poisonous limestone dust used to whitewash the walls. Whether Gibson's obvious equation of Mayan civilization at its most degenerate and 21st century America strikes you as provocative or facile, the fact that I still find the Mayan-city sequence so potently haunting speaks to its power. As to the criticism that Gibson depicts the Maya as so unrepentantly bestial that you're rooting for the Catholic Spanish (glimpse briefly at the very end) to sweep in and "civilize" them all (even if that means killing every last one), I don't buy it: I think the Koyaanisqatsi factor is much more pertinent.
In any event, I see hundreds of movies every year and rarely does one surprise me as much as Apocalypto. For me, that alone is reason to recommend it.
Things to consider:
Is it more or less distancing to make a movie set in another country in the culturally appropriate langue with subtitles or in English? Could you imagine 300 in classical Greek – why or why not?
Is there a movie that really sticks with you because of the way it depicted a culture that was, in real life, completely alien (ancient Rome, the Civil War-era US, tsarist Russia…) to your experience?
What do you think about using ancient, non-Western cultures to make an allegorical statement about a contemporary Western issue? Specifically -- Gibson's Mayan city sits amid ecologically blighted former jungle, drought has turned its citizens to mass sacrifice to the gods rather than practical action.
One specialist in Mesoamerican art and culture referred to the film's slave-collecting city warriors as "Orcs in loincloths" – thoughts?
Previously in DVD Tuesday
Citizen Kane La Jetée Gone in 60 Seconds (1974) Bob le Flambeur Near Dark Perfect Blue Pan's Labyrinth Les Girls The Girl Who Knew Too Much The Queen Expresso Bongo I'm Not Scared Shocking Grindhouse Double Bill! — Scanners and The Candy Snatchers Don't Look Now Re-Animator Casino Royale http://community.tvguide.com/thread.jspa?threadID=800073953#comments">Pi The Prestige 13 Tzameti The Departed Suspiria Kiss and Make Up Kiss Me Deadly The Long Good Friday What Alice Found The Devil's Backbone The Descent The Devil Wears Prada Pandora's Box The Thief and the Cobbler Nashville Panic in the Streets/Jack Palance Interview The Pusher Trilogy Scarface Slither Sunset Blvd. In Cold Blood Brick
Also: This week's new DVD releases
|
TVGuide Links:
|
|
|
|
Jul 2, 2007 6:19 PM
|
|
Maitland - I know it's based on western culture but the first movie that really opened my eyes was Dances With Wolves. It was the first movie I have ever seen that made me ashamed to be a white person.
|
|
Jul 2, 2007 7:20 PM
|
Is there a movie that really sticks with you because of the way it depicted a culture that was, in real life, completely alien (ancient Rome, the Civil War-era US, tsarist Russia…) to your experience?
Pepe Le Moko/Algiers have stayed with me due in large part to their depiction of the Casbah. The interwoven physical structure reflected in the way the lives of each denizen are interlocked with the others fascinated me. Similarly City Of God with its subjects living in the Casbah like ghetto of Rio de Janeiro is one of the most impressive films I have ever seen. As in the Casbah the residents have their own routine and way of getting around the outside power structure with a loose but fairly universally accepted set of rules of conduct. As it is for the dwellers of the Casbah the police and the law are an invading/occupying force.
With all three movies I was drawn completely into a world that is nothing like anything I have known except. The closest I have come was the brief period of time I spent living in and around Greenwich Village making my living as a street singer and doing odd jobs and sharing resources with other citizens of that demi-monde. But I always knew I would rise out of it. Things did not seem as hopeless-and certainly not as violent-as they were for some of the people in City Of God. Unlike many of them I did not feel as though it was my fate to stay in that situation-that I was born to it and that it was my lot in life.
I wish I had seen Apocalypto in a theatre but I’m looking forward to the DVD.
|
|
Jul 3, 2007 3:15 AM
|
Apocalypto was stunning for me. In a very short time I wasn't even aware of reading the dialogue - maybe because it was scarce and in movies with such tightly drawn action you know who the bad guy is and who is the hero. I absolutely loved the detail of the movie. Watching it on DVD might not be the way to get the spectacle, but the special features really can add to the viewers knowledge base and in my case awe. I think many movies mix time periods or events in a dramatic license. Not all movie makers are as minutely inspected as Mel Gibson, however.
To respond to your things to consider, I thought Amistad was a movie I needed to see. As ugly as slavery was to me, my imagination didn't take me to the horror of the voyage from home to bondage. But not only that, Djimon Hounsou's portrayal of Cinque was so riveting, it also brought me full circle to the power of the spirit when clothed with truth.
|
|
Jul 3, 2007 4:49 PM
|
Just saw Apocalypto. It reminded me once again of how good a director Mel Gibson is. It also underscored the fact that personality flaws, prejudices and even outright bigotry do not preclude great artistry.
Apocalypto was stunning and like Cindy I forgot about the subtitles very quickly. Purely without design I had seen another example of the type of chase movie Maitland mentions just the day before. Seraphim Falls was exciting and compelling with some great work not only from its leads, Pierce Brosnan and Liam Neeson but from supporting cast members notably Xander Berkeley and Ed Lauter. Unlike Apocalypto though, Seraphim's director decided to get "artsy" toward the end of the movie and it kept the film from reaching the heights of Apocalypto or even The Proposition both of which seemed to realize that telling a compelling story in an exciting and gripping way is art enough.
|
|
Jul 5, 2007 3:40 AM
|
I would very much like to piss on Gibson's parade so I'll see this as an apt transplant of Jewish representation.
With its themes of displacement, aggressors, prophetic chosen ones, uprising and staying true to beliefs and traditions (seen in final scenes).
|
|
Jul 5, 2007 4:59 PM
|
|
Re greent: What the.......?
|
|
Jul 6, 2007 3:48 AM
|
|
|